CONCLUSIONS & APPENDICES
Appendix 3: Questionable Witnesses
Appendix 4: Paparazzi Evidence
Appendix 7: Plastic Sample Boxes
THE EVIDENCE
© 2019 John Douglas Bryant. All rights reserved.
• Diana was NOT trapped in the Mercedes as stated. • Bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones WAS wearing a seat belt. • The French police were wrong about how far the paparazzi were behind the Mercedes • The French police were wrong about the speeds of the paparazzi vehicles and the Mercedes. • Two cars hit the Mercedes. • Some alleged witnesses invented their stories. • Some witnesses were pressured to change their evidence. • Ritz Hotel and Etoile Limousine staff gave false information, which implicated Henri Paul. • The French authorities destroyed crucial evidence. • Incriminating ‘evidence’ was planted in Henri Paul’s home. • The choice of hospital was pre-planned, which raises further questions. • The medical staff delayed Diana’s treatment, unwittingly or otherwise. • The actions of the paparazzi were covered up.
CONCLUSIONS OF THIS INVESTIGATION
THE CRASH
• The genuine Henri Paul blood samples were labelled after the autopsy for DNA testing. • The blood tested for alcohol was taken from a body that came from the refrigerator room. Henri Paul’s body was not refrigerated. • There was no second Henri Paul autopsy on September 4th, 1997. • There was no CDT test. • Henri Paul was neither drunk nor speeding.
HENRI PAUL
THE VERDICT
• The paparazzi caused the crash and failed to provide assistance to the injured.
• The white Fiat Uno was a red herring, invented to exonerate the paparazzi. • There was no substantive search for the white Fiat Uno. • If the rear light fragments found in the tunnel truly came from a Fiat Uno, it could have been any colour.
THE WHITE FIAT UNO